|
An online monthly research publication by the Ivey Business School
Previous Issues of Impact
| Register for
Impact
Volume 15, Number 9: Faculty Focus
September 2009
| |
Listen to
a 5-minute interview
with Professor Jeffrey Gandz
on moral character and ethical
organizations
|
Listen
(4.5MB)
|
Subscribe
 |
|
 |
|
As explanations
begin to emerge of what caused the financial
crisis of 2008-9, there is an overwhelming
emphasis on the failure of “the system.” Most
people agree that there were systemic problems:
the combination of low interest rates, with lots
of money available, an overheated property
market, huge borrowing by consumers, lax
regulation of derivatives markets and the bank
liquidity crisis made a recession that was
inevitable just that much worse. Ashleigh Nimigan recently sat down with Professor Jeffrey
Gandz to discuss why commentators on the current
crisis have only blamed “the system” and not the
individual people who made the bad decisions.
A.
I think to blame the system is to miss the
issue. It’s the like the late great American
comedian Flip Wilson said, “The devil made me do
it.” Well the devil didn’t make anybody do it.
These were decisions that were made by people
that then get folded in to the system. People in
financial institutions, in some of them, decided
that they would launch these kinds of structure
products that were very, very highly leveraged.
It wasn’t the system that made them do it, they
decided to do it because it was profitable for
their business. Consumers didn’t have to get
themselves into the kind of debt situation they
got in, by buying things they couldn’t afford
–they could have restrained their expenditure.
So, it was a series of individual decision and
as soon as we stop taking personal
accountability, then in fact we give up the
autonomy that we have, we give up our sense of
responsibility. So I refuse to accept systemic
explanations, without at the same time
recognizing that these are personal decisions
that people make [and their essential moral
character affects how they make these types of
decisions].
Q. What
are some of the key elements of a moral
character and how can managers implement these
virtues?
A. The
idea of a moral character dates back to the time
of Aristotle, thousands of years ago. Moral
characters have courage, they have temperance,
they have respect for others, they have
humility. They have these virtues that
distinguish them from characters who just
immediately respond to a stimulus, by acting a
certain way. [Moral characters] think about the
consequences of their actions. They think about
long term and short term; they think about how
others may be affected by what they do; they
have some sense of connectedness to the society
in which they live; and so they make their
decisions accordingly. It’s not just a
do-gooder, it has more depth than that.
Q. Can
you share a few recommendations for designing
ethical organizations?
A.
I think there are a number of things that
leaders of organizations can do that will go a
long way towards ensuring that organizations
function in an ethical way. Firstly, they can
talk about it. They can articulate what it means
to act ethically. They can, through their own
personal behaviour, model ethical behaviour.
I think most
critically, it matters who they promote within
the organization. I believe that who you promote
is the single most impactful piece of
communications you can give within an
organization. If they promote somebody who may
be a high performer but people question their
ethics, when those people are promoted, it sends
a message through the organization that says
that is what this organization values.
[Lastly,] you
can train people. What often happens in complex
situations, people don’t necessarily know or
understand where the problems lie. So with very
good training and development you can help
people understand what the right thing and the
wrong thing to do is in a certain set of
situations. You do it by working through
situations. At the business school we work
through cases that have ethical complications
and consequences. And you help people realize
that there is sometimes more to making a
decision than just the maximization of
shareholder value.
That was
Jeffrey Gandz, Professor and Program
Director of Executive Development, at the
Richard Ivey School of Business.
|