Report on Business: International
No signs of Argentine Flu, so far
Unlike past crises, the world was ready for this one, analysts say
HEATHER SCOFFIELD
926 words
14 January 2002
The Globe and Mail
Metro
B7
English
"All material Copyright (c) Bell Globemedia Publishing Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved."
BUENOS AIRES -- Canadians have seen it as the Tequila Effect, the Asian
Flu and the Samba Effect -- contagion from another country's financial
crisis that hits Canada and other sound nations in the form of a sharply
weakening currency and higher risk premiums on bonds.
Now Argentina is embarking on the world's biggest debt default and is in
the midst of a sharp devaluation. But so far, no Tango Effect to speak of.
Analysts warn that it may just be a matter of time before Argentina's
crisis spills over into its close neighbours and trading partners --
Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. But nobody is talking international crisis,
like we saw when Thailand devalued the bhat in 1997.
When Thailand fell, other Asian countries toppled like dominoes in quick
succession, with foreign investors yanking their money out of Indonesia,
Malaysia, Hong Kong and elsewhere, undermining financial sectors and
devaluing currencies. The Asian flu spread to Russia, and Canada's dollar
dropped to what was then an all-time low. Commodity prices around the
world were hammered by the crisis.
Brazil began to teeter, and then it fell too, devaluing its currency and
rattling emerging markets, especially in Latin America, during the first
half of 1999.
Mexico's devaluation in 1994 saw similar ripples throughout the world,
mainly in the Americas.
Argentina has had some effects on other countries. When Argentina
announced it would devalue its fixed currency last week, Uruguay
immediately followed suit. Brazilian companies doing business in Argentina
or dependent on Argentine trade have been hurt severely and are not
content to keep quiet about it. And the Brazilian government, having
experienced its own crisis just a few years ago and anxious to avoid a
repeat, has told Argentina it will do all it can to help its neighbour
regain stability.
But spreads on Brazilian bonds -- a measure of risk -- were higher a year
ago than they are now. And the Brazilian real seems to be trading on its
own fundamentals, not Argentina's. However, the real showed some weakness
Friday, as did markets in Chile and Mexico, after a chaotic process that
led to some of Argentina's pesos beginning to trade at a floating rate.
But it's hardly a crisis.
The lack of contagion was one of the prime reasons the International
Monetary Fund felt comfortable refusing to extend $1.3-billion (U.S.) to
Argentina in December. The tranche was part of a larger loan to be given
to the Argentine government only if it lived up to certain fiscal
conditions, which were not met.
So, why hasn't Argentina's pandemonium spread? Partly because many
international investors predicted the Argentine crisis well over a year
ago and have had plenty of time to readjust their portfolios calmly,
without punishing other markets for Argentina's problems, economists say.
"Argentina's downfall has been one of the best-telegraphed crises in
recent memory, and that has given investors plenty of time to head for the
exits," said Gillian Manning, international economist for Toronto-Dominion
Bank.
"This latest flare-up was the culmination of a long, slow burn during
which Argentina became progressively more isolated from other emerging
markets. That will help to keep the contagion limited in the months to
come," she said.
The containment of Argentina's crisis is also partly because key emerging
market bond indexes, which were heavily weighted toward the country a year
ago, have gradually cut back. The J.P. Morgan index now has virtually no
Argentina weighting. Instead, other emerging markets, especially Brazil,
now carry heavier weightings, prompting portfolio investors to gradually
dump Argentina bonds and buy Brazil instead.
"There is a general sense of anticipation that international investors
will pick up Brazilian bonds due to the removal of Argentina from the
[J.P. Morgan Emerging Market Bond Index]," said Walter Molano, head of
research at BCP Securities.
Other analysts point out that during the Asia crisis, it was only
countries with fixed exchange rates that were vulnerable to mass
withdrawals by international investors. Now, however, most of the world's
key emerging markets have been forced to switch to floating exchange
rates.
Argentina was a key exception. And while other Latin American economies
are no doubt feeling the economic effects of having trade and investment
with Argentina virtually come to a standstill, they are able to absorb
those effects in their floating exchange rates without dropping into a
crisis.
Still, the crisis in Argentina is far from over. The new government of
Eduardo Duhalde faces growing street protests, dissent from within his own
party, and intense pressure from foreign investors in Argentina as well as
the IMF. And so far, he has not come up with a long-term economic plan for
the country.
While many of Argentina's problems right now are a result of its own
political and economic mismanagement, the country itself is partly a
victim of contagion.
Few currency traders or investors doubted Argentina's ability to uphold
its 10-year-old one-to-one peg with the U.S. dollar until Brazil devalued
in 1999. Only then did confidence begin to erode in Argentina's ability to
find sufficient reserves to back up its currency. That lack of confidence
spilled over into the general public, who turned their backs on pesos in
favour of dollars, and undermined support for the financial system,
economists say.
Illustration
Document glob000020020114dy1e0001k