We conducted many interviews with executives about factors that influence their firms’ foreign location decisions. We found that these decisions are not detached from microfoundational managerial preferences and are instead often based on how troublesome it is for managers to travel to or live in certain places. The consequence is that even the most reputable multinationals frequently end up with a location mix that is suboptimal for their future global growth.
Utilizing a multi-method research design, we developed an 11-item measure composed of travel inconveniences that have a significant negative effect on the relationship between foreign investment potenital and realized investment. We call this phenomenon the “Hassle Factor.” This website provides a visualization of the "Hassle Factor" in the form of an interactive world map and country by country cobweb graphics for 131 locations. We also provide the country scores as a downloadable MS-Excel file in the resources section.
The Journal of International Business Studies published the full research study in 2013:
Schotter, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2013). The hassle factor: An explanation for managerial location shunning. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5), 521-544.
The Hassle Factors (Rank ordered High to Low)
Click on country names to compare scores
|Lowest Hassle Factor Countries||Highest Hassle Factor Countries|
|1. Denmark||1. Sudan|
|2. Canada||2. Angola|
|3. Belgium||3. Nicaragua|
|4. Austria||4. Burkina Faso|
|5. UK||5. Nigeria|
|6. Germany||6. Laos|